A Difficult Person Test (characterized: DPT) is a set of self-report psychological questions to identify how agreeable, compassionate, respectful, and sociable a person is. The initial quizzes used Dr. Sleep and her team’s findings on Personality Disorders for their questionaries. But other formats are available, too.

Although the goal is to assess the agreeableness of a person, a standard DPT can do more. The test on this page reveals the levels of sociopath and antagonism as well. A Scientific Analysis Based on FFM

A 2020 study at the University of Georgia showed that Five-Factor Model is the best way to identify difficult individuals. According to this model, the level of agreeableness determines whether a person is complicated or not. Our quiz uses the same scientific data to provide you with 100% results.

Assessing your agreeableness

The primary aim of the test is to evaluate your friendliness and sociability. Higher levels of openness indicate a thinner chance of being a complicated individual. Estimating the dominant difficult personality trait( s).

Based on Dr. Chelsea’s research, seven factors are common in difficult people, “callousness, grandiosity, aggressiveness, suspicion, manipulativeness, dominance, and risk-taking.” The quiz explains which of the said factors are more active in your personality– if there are any.

Offering solutions accordingly.

By the end of the questionary, you receive pieces of expert advice on how not to be a difficult person, an antagonist, or even a sociopath. Difficult Person VS. Antagonist.

According to FFM, personality is a set of five traits, openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. And a difficult person is one who has lower levels of agreeableness compared to others. Such a person might be sufficient in other four factors.

However, an antagonist (as a psychological term) refers to a person who lacks most of the said five traits. The Psychology Dictionary defines it as “The thwarter of another individual, using adversary action.”.

Online DPTs sometimes use the two terms interchangeably. But that is wrong. A Complicated or unfriendly character does not necessarily match antagonistic characteristics.

Note: Our test can distinguish the two types of personalities accurately.

The 7 Factors of Being a Difficult Person (by Chelsea E. Sleep).

IDR-DPT and most other online quizzes are based on a recent study by the University of Georgia. The said research classified the characteristics of a difficult person test into seven traits.

Remember that you do not need to have all the seven factors to be a complicated individual. However, studies show that one with an unfriendly character is more likely to have most said traits.

What if the Test Says You Are a Difficult Person?

A 2017 study proved that people with personality disorders are willing to change for the better despite generic beliefs. According to this research-backed by American Psychological Association, “Individuals with PD traits tolerate but dislike those traits, believe that they are impairing, and are interested in reducing them.”.

So, you might already be asking, “How can I avoid being a difficult person?” Here are a couple of tips on how to be friendlier and more open.

1. Fewer judgments, more questions.

Viktor Sander says, “Agreeable people are tolerant and open-minded.” So, instead of evaluating others, ask them questions. Let them explain their intentions and visions.

2. Let your assumptions go.

” Disagreeable people often hold unhelpful assumptions that make them unlikable,” says Sander in his 2021 article. If your Difficult Person Test result was positive, you probably have some of the said suppositions. Saying things like, “Everyone is stupid,” is a red flag. You are better off without such hypotheses if you want to look sociable.

3. Help others with no expectations.

You need to learn to give without necessarily expecting to receive. Unconditional support is key to seem friendly and agreeable. (But make sure not to overdo it and let others abuse your kindness).

The Problem with Most Online DPTs.

Block, a famous personality researcher, believes that many online tests are inaccurate due to the Jingle-Jangle problem. Different qualities with the same labels and different labels for the same qualities reduce the accuracy of the questionaries.

When it comes to DPTs, Jingle-Jangle terms such as antagonism, sociopathy, and even psychopathy negatively affect the results. And a Difficult Personality Test must distinguish them.

QuizExpo relies on FFM and Dr. Sleep’s seven factors of character complicacy to deliver accurate results. Our questionnaire differentiates mental disorders such as psychopathy from PDs and casual human traits.

Things to Know Before Taking the infoiteb.

Here are a couple of quick reminders:. Unfriendliness is not a mental disorder.

Take the Difficult Person Test results lightly. Disagreeableness is not a mental health issue. While it might be rooted in such problems, it is not a stand-alone disorder. There is no clinical way of spotting difficult people.

Lots of studies have been conducted on the subject lately. However, it is still challenging to diagnose one with personality complicate issues clinically. Still, talking to a therapist or psychologist is your best bet to find out if you are an unfriendly individual. Taking an online DPT is another option in case you do not want to consult a professional.The results are not an excuse for being a toxic individual.

You should not use the “difficult person” label to get away with toxicity. Some traits such as manipulativeness, aggressiveness, and risk-taking might also hurt others’ mental and physical health. So, you should be responsible for your actions and avoid irritating or abusing people around you.

Disclaimer.

infoiteb is not related to any of the organizations mentioned in the DPT.

Have you taken the Difficult Person Test?

A friend sent it to me, and I sent it to other friends. Most of us shrugged off the questions– the answers seemed pretty obvious. And yet everyone got slightly different results. While the majority (including myself) scored on the “easy to get along with” side, I was struck by how we each had different ranges of the seven traits highlighted:

Callousness.

Grandiosity.

Aggressiveness.

Suspicion.

Manipulativeness.

Dominance.

Risk-taking.

Not only that, but none of us got a score of 0%, meaning none of us are 0% difficult people. It turns out that even if you think you’re easy to work and get along with, you still probably have at least one of these annoying traits. Is this a legit test? Yep, here’s how it works.

You might be thinking that none of this matters, that it’s hard to take a test posted on a site that contains several Harry …

Personality quizzes have been popular since they were invented, but I am puzzled that this particular one– one of the most unflattering tests I’ve ever found– went viral earlier this year.

Hogwarts Houses, MBTI, which TV character are you– the results of these viral quizzes are typically fawning descriptions of our most admirable qualities. But in 2021, we decided to kick off the year not by posting about being a strong and brave Gryffindor or a rational and curious INTJ. Instead, we’ve been much more interested in letting everyone know just how difficult other people find us.

Chelsea Sleep, who is a clinical psychology PhD candidate at the University of Georgia and whose research the quiz is based on *, told me she studies these darker personality traits for exactly that reason. “I love thinking about how we conceptualize personality. I think that it’s particularly important for traits like antagonism, that can have significant implications [for individuals], but are relatively understudied compared to other traits.”.

On platforms like Tiktok and Twitter, people of every age have been sharing their test results under the and encouraging others to join in.

This leads me to a question that I was dwelling on after I got my results: Why do I– and other people online– care so much about this quiz? Why do we want to know what sucks about us, and what makes ourselves, and other people, so specifically aggravating?

I believe the pandemic is a big factor.

In the “before times,” I was able to collect a lot of information around what other people thought of me through their facial expressions, body language, availability, tone of voice, and so on. But now my communications have become finely ground into technological bits and pieces. I use text messages and emojis to express my state of mind to friends. I rely on video calls and my internet router to collaborate with my peers. Zoom has become the best platform for an intimate conversation with anyone who is not in my “pod.”.

Starting a couple of new jobs during the pandemic has made this even trickier. Suddenly I have coworkers and managers and HR departments. Though there are some perks– they’re all conversing with me at a perfect 90-degree angle, which would be unlikely in real life (I’m 5′ 3″)– I’m still missing the novel information my mind needs to validate how I’m coming across. Because I don’t have any data points to cling to, it’s easier for me to assume the worst.

I spoke with John Hackston, the head of thought leadership at The Myers-Briggs Company, to see if he could give me more insight into the matter. Hackston and his team have conducted research around how our personalities impact our choices, habits, and work. “People are missing social mirrors, their usual way of interacting with others,” he told me. “They’re not getting the same regular information they were getting from interactions before.”.

Hackston’s feedback made me realize: Maybe the Difficult Person Test is helping me, and everyone else who became obsessed with it, fill this void. Maybe it is our new social mirror. For the first time in a long time, the quiz gave me a definite answer to how much I might actually be annoying all of the new people in my life. Seeing as how the quiz went viral, maybe I’m not alone in this feeling either.

Naturally, I turned to Google to learn more, and came across an article from therapist and writer Kathleen Smith, “Stop Guessing Who’s Mad At You.”.

Smith writes, “One thing I’ve observed with my therapy clients over the course of the pandemic is that many of us have become anxious mind readers, constantly certain that our friends think we’re terrible or our co-workers think we’re lazy. A tiff between siblings suddenly feels irreparable. A Zoom session with a grumpy boss feels like a guarantee that a firing is on the horizon. In isolation, we read every sign as pointing to the same conclusion: Someone is probably upset with us.”.

Like Smith observes, this is not a very comfortable place to be in– and lately, I’ve been determined to get out of it. To start, I looked back at my Difficult Person Test results (with all my new wisdom at hand).

The infoiteb told me that I’m 30.71% difficult. As you can see in my results below, I got low manipulation, but higher grandiosity. I joked with a friend that this basically means I’m an example of the Dunning-Kruger effect– a brain bias in which people are basically too incompetent to realize they’re not as smart and capable as they think. And despite her high scores in suspicion and aggression, my friend brushed off that interpretation. “I feel that trait actually makes you brave,” she said. When I found out my editor for this piece also got a high grandiosity score, I was inclined to think of it as merely an outcropping of our creative sensibilities.

These interactions opened somewhat of a door for me. In them, I saw potential to flip every one of my “so-called” vices into a virtue. Think about it: Are we “dominant,” or are we assertive? Are we “suspicious,” or are we full of healthy skepticism? In my experience, while we often see evil and good as separate entities that live within us, they are usually deeply connected. Maybe a part of learning about ourselves during this pandemic, and a part of getting out of our anxious, catastrophizing heads, will come from our choice to see our good qualities instead of dwelling on the bad ones.

I followed up with Smith to see if I was headed the right direction.

” Personality tests are a way to manage anxiety,” she said. “It’s naturally calming to be assigned to a group. It seems to say, hey, it’s okay to be this way.” Smith told me that she thinks the infoiteb is useful for measuring our self-awareness in that way.

” Truly the most difficult people are the ones who have no self-awareness,” she explained. “They are really unable to evaluate their actions objectively.”.

So here’s what I’ve come to: The fact that I took this quiz at all– or the fact that you, the reader, now want to take the quiz– shows that we are curious about ourselves and we are self-aware enough to recognize our flaws, both of which are good things. Most of us are trying to do our best, not just during this pandemic but all the time. Our best usually means trying to do right by our friends, families, and colleagues.

We should also consider that the real people to worry about are not ourselves, but the people who would not take this quiz at all. According to Smith’s logic, truly dark personalities aren’t worried about identifying why they are dark. They operate under the principle that they should get opportunities simply because they want them, and their actions hurt others more than themselves. It’s the same kind of narcissism that prevents people from wearing a mask during the pandemic– they’re willing to put everyone at risk for the sake of their ego.

If you took the quiz and found out you’re a little grandiose or suspicious or whatever– then try to do as I now do, and seriously, don’t worry about it. Our participation alone demonstrates our desire to do right by others. That’s the first step towards better cooperation and collaboration in any kind of relationship or work environment.

That, and never scheduling a meeting that could’ve been an email.

* Chelsea Sleep informed us that she hadn’t heard of the Difficult Person Test before we sent it to her, and didn’t contribute to the language or creation of it, but IDRLabs confirms they used her research to create it.